The ongoing macro-economic and foreign exchange (FX) volatility presents a critical challenge for businesses that operate internationally. Its impact on earnings predictability, liquidity, and solvency demands a proactive and strategic approach. While Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) teams focus on forecasting and scenario planning, CFOs or finance executives in charge of managing Treasury are tasked with safeguarding the business against catastrophic scenarios.
This dual responsibility makes it imperative for FP&A and treasury teams to work in tandem. Collaborative action is the only way businesses can build resilience amid today’s ongoing market turbulence.
FX volatility doesn’t just affect large corporations; mid-market enterprises and even small businesses also feel the pressure. Its impact is twofold:
Distinct Roles:
Achieving alignment allows businesses to address both predictable and extreme impacts, fostering a cohesive and reliable financial outlook.
FP&A teams are at the forefront of modelling likely scenarios to ensure organisations are prepared for foreseeable market conditions. For businesses that operate internationally this includes FX rates used in the scenarios - so called “budget rates” but more often than not, require treasury teams or other experts to provide such FX budget rates to FP&A.
The FP&A priorities focus on the following key areas:
FP&A teams often employ forecasting techniques like rolling forecasts, sensitivity analyses, and scenario planning to create accurate and actionable models.
These models include:
By focusing on agility, accuracy, and responsiveness, FP&A establishes a strong foundation for decision-making.
Treasury plays a complementary role, focusing beyond expected scenarios and preparing for extreme risk. This forward-looking approach ensures the business is safeguarded even under the harshest conditions.
Key priorities include mitigating financial crises, extreme FX volatility, and even systemic banking risks. Treasury’s toolkit comprises a variety of strategies:
Treasury ensures that even under catastrophic scenarios, the organisation’s liquidity and solvency remain strong.
Planning for FX uncertainty is married to the notion that exchange rates move randomly over time and the changes in value of currencies over a specific period of time have different likelihood. This likelihood is distributed in a manner close to a normal distribution.
For example, the graph below shows the historical distribution of 90-day moves of the Pound Sterling vs the US Dollar (grey) and it is a normally distributed model. As one can see, most of the potential outcomes are small moves, clustered around zero but in more rare outcomes the exchange rate moved more than 20% over 90 days.
Treasury managers should be most concerned with potential 1 in 100 and 1 in 5 chances (red and orange areas) while FP&A team is focused on the area closer to the middle of the bell curve, trusting that the treasury or risk manager will take care of the tail risk scenarios.
The connection between FP&A and Treasury lies in their ability to inform and enhance each other’s work. A coordinated approach can help businesses achieve more accurate forecasting and better risk mitigation.
How FP&A Supports Treasury:
How Treasury Enhances FP&A:
For example, if FP&A forecasts a 10% risk to revenues and Treasury executes a targeted hedge using forward contracts, the combined effort ensures both predictability and protection.
Collaboration hinges on effective communication. Here’s how FP&A and Treasury can bridge the gap and work better together:
Practical steps like the above can transform two siloed departments into a unified force against FX uncertainty.
An international mid-market retailer successfully navigated 2022’s currency chaos by establishing a joint FX task force between FP&A and Treasury. By pooling data-driven insights and implementing collaborative hedging strategies, the company reduced its FX-related earnings impact by 15%, while maintaining 20% liquidity buffers.
On the other hand, a mid-sized manufacturing company experienced losses of up to $2 million due to misalignment. FP&A correctly estimated currency exposures, but Treasury underhedged due to making their decisions on the back of stale forecasts from FP&A, leading to unnecessary FX losses. This siloed approach resulted in volatile cashflows and strategic missteps.
Collaboration is not just a best practice but a financial imperative.
When FP&A and Treasury operate independently, the risks grow exponentially, including:
The cost of isolation far outweighs the investment in collaboration.
Aligning FP&A and Treasury doesn’t have to be daunting. Use this framework to get started:
This checklist ensures a practical roadmap for integration and synergy.
The key to managing FX uncertainty lies in the alignment of FP&A and Treasury. Together, they:
With the stakes of FX volatility higher than ever, mid-market businesses must act now. Begin strengthening your FX strategy by fostering collaboration between these vital functions.
Discover how HedgeFlows industry experts can help you identify and quantify FX risks with tools to manage them.