SaaS negotiations are hard. As a procurement partner you have to juggle:
There are so many moving parts and plates to keep spinning, it feels like a daunting, no-win, proposition. At least, that’s what it may seem to someone new to the role.
And so when a procurement partner entrusts this to junior, less experienced buyers, customers will often receive a confused, inefficient and ultimately poor level of service.
Some may try to get round this by ‘sharing’ the load between experience and inexperience, but using multiple purchasing managers for a single project also results in the same problem - longer, inefficient contract cycles with inadequate outcomes.
At Vertice, we encounter stories like this from new customers all the time. Slow, clumsy negotiation processes; contracts that seem to favor the vendors; and ultimately savings promises that are not realized.
Here’s what a few of our recent new customers had to say…
You may think that having many purchasing managers working on your project means you are likely to get better results, given the additional eyes and brains involved.
This tends not to be the case. It creates a stunted, unclear process where your project is passed around, particularly amongst junior buyers. So you’re never really sure who is doing what, and what is being achieved - and everything simply takes longer.
It is also easier for a customer to brief one experienced procurement expert and have them act for you and in your interests. Not only in terms of your financial objectives, but also ensuring that the contract matches your strategy, corporate ambitions and expected needs. These nuances are almost impossible to communicate across a wide, fragmented, transient team, so before you know it, contracts are being taken in the wrong direction by a junior buyer whose negotiations are focusing on the wrong things.
And trust is lost.
Matching the customer’s needs to the capabilities and pros and cons of the multitude of options for every sort of SaaS tool is an art.
It requires an in-depth knowledge of the marketplace, common features and technical abilities of tools, and a clear understanding of your current issues and ideal growth pathway.
If your procurement partner's buyer team lacks such experience, they will struggle to put the pieces of this puzzle together for you - devaluing the advice they can give you.
As a procurement partner, negotiating with SaaS vendors is a tightrope. Your primary goal is to get the best deal for your customer, but to do so without affecting a solid (but still impartial) relationship with a vendor so you can continue to negotiate with them effectively in the future.
The best procurement partners will have three core traits:
Skill, diligence and knowledge come with experience. Without these three you’re entering negotiations without leverage, which means contracts are destined to not meet the customer’s financial and business requirements.
See how FMG turned to Vertice to fix problems that had arisen from a third-party procurement partner that did not properly check and evaluate contracts.
Vertice has expert SaaS buyers that have negotiated over 8,000 contracts for our customers. Drawn from a variety of procurement backgrounds, including KPMG, Zillow, and Accenture, their invaluable and wide-ranging experience enables us to achieve savings of up to 30% across contracts.
They work with you 1-on-1 to understand your short and long term requirements, and help recommend vendors and contract structures that fit you individually. And they’re always on hand for advice and questions, so you can build that rapport and trust with them quickly.
And they work collaboratively with each other, sharing their knowledge and expertise regularly to ensure that whilst you have a dedicated manager, you get the SaaS buying experience of an entire team of subject matter experts.
That’s the type of experience you need from a procurement partner.
Discover how Vertice's spend optimisation platform could be a benefit to your business with the Tech 100!